Personal Injury Law

Police Chase Cases Do Not Always Protect the Public

Our firm is working on a police chase case involving an officer who has been in two separate high speed pursuit cases resulting in two deaths. We have learned in this case that another officer in the same department has also been involved in two other accidents that have resulted in four deaths. Thus, between these two officers within the same police department there have been 4 high speed pursuit cases we know of involving six deaths. Is the public being protected when police officers engage in these high speed police chases? We think not.

An officer cannot fire his service revolver into a crowded mall in order to stop a shoplifter. Most people understand that it would be too dangerous for an officer to fire his weapon in a crowded mall to apprehend a suspect for such a minor offense. In short, the danger to the public would far outweigh the need to apprehend the suspect. And yet, in a police pursuit context, the police are firing their proverbial guns (engaging in chases) on crowded streets, sometimes in residential areas, sometimes at night and sometimes under circumstances where there are many innocent motorists on the road, and yet, even in those cases where the need to apprehend the suspect is far outweighed by the danger to the public, the chase proceeds. The question is why these practices continue to occur year after year in this country with no meaningful decrease in the carnage on the roads.

Regrettably, it appears that the deaths and injuries which do occur in these cases simply have not affected the right people. When the injured are the family of politicians, perhaps there will be a change in the law. If the next police chase victimizes a prominent politician?s family perhaps there will be an understanding of the dangers of these high speed pursuits. Until such time, the public will continue to be ?entertained? by television shows depicting the excitement and adrenalin that one feels when viewing a high speed pursuit. We can assure the public that such adrenalin and excitement would not be felt if their loved one was killed as a result of a pursuit involving a minor offense such as shoplifting. Indeed, as of the writing of this blog, we are reviewing a case where a shoplifter was fleeing from a police officer and during that pursuit, two adults and a child were killed and another adult seriously injured. Was the price worth it? Again, we think not.

It appears that litigation is the best avenue currently available to decrease these unwise and unwarranted police practices. The police do not protect the public when they kill innocent members of the public they are sworn to protect. The police should not chase non-violent offenders. There are ways to capture these suspects through license tag registration information, radio traffic and other police practices. Even if we as a society have to let a shoplifter or traffic offender go, is this not the more prudent approach than to impose the death penalty on innocent third parties having nothing to do with the crime? If the reader says that he or she disagrees with this conclusion, then I would ask the reader to ask themselves why then should the police not fire their weapons in a crowded mall? The analysis is the same.

Full post as published by Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog on January 14, 2008 (boomark / email).