Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> With Vigour and Zeal
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate & Securities Law
: With Vigour and ZealRes judicata of US class action judgments
By Werner R. Kranenburg
Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP has published its annual 10b-5 Guide (2007) this summer, with thanks to Paul A. Ferrillo for this submission. It includes discussion of two cases that have featured here, one of which is Borochoff v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC (p.156). In that case the judge did not appoint as lead plaintiff the movant with the largest combined loss, a group of German investors, due to the concern whether “the foreign courts will not enforce a decision in favor of [defendant] against foreign plaintiffs in the class.? In the case of Vivendi Universal S.A. (p.175) the court included some foreign countries into the classification and specifically excluded others over the same concern. (Also see In re Rhodia S.A. Sec. Litig., p.195.)
In his 2007 paper Recognition and Res Judicata of U.S. Class Action Judgments in European Legal Systems, Andrea Pinna (LinkedIn) of French law firm Darrois Villey Maillot Brochier (no URL) adresses exactly that concern, with thanks to Prof. Dr. Ianika M. Tzankova for her notifying me of the paper. Pinna actually concludes that his “analysis seems to suggest that the hostility of European legal systems towards granting Res Judicata effect to US class action judgments is progressively declining… [as a] consequence of a general acceptance of the necessity of renovating the old-continent civil procedures with tools allowing the consolidation of individual claims in collective claims.” (p.29 of 31)
Since the paper was published, more ‘old-continent’ jurisdictions have adopted collective claim procedures. DLA Piper’s article Global Realm of Securities Class Actions, with thanks to The 10b-5 Daily, highlights some of these procedures in its discussion of “the evolution of the class action device for securities claims in foreign jurisdictions.”
(Also of interest in a wider context is Prof. Samuel P. Baumgartner’s paper How Well Do U.S. Judgments Fare in Europe?, published just a few weeks after Pinna’s paper.)
Full post as published by With Vigour and Zeal on November 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
PTDS class action
Veterans Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Class Action
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement
Settlement Reached in Female Athletes' Class Action
Slippery Rock University Settles Discrimination Class Action
GE Reitrement Class Action Settled
GE $40 Million Settlement Agreed in Retirement Class Action
Environmental Class Action to Proceed Against DuPont
DuPont New Jersey Drinking Water Contamination Class Action to Proceed
Class Action Filed Over Incontinence Briefs
Arizona Health Care Faces Federal Class Action over Incontinence Briefs

COA Applies Res Judicata To Sovereign Immunity Dismissal
Declaratory Judgments and Claim Preclusion
COA Reverses Res Judicata Ruling
Petition Not Barred by Res Judicata Where Based On Newly Discovered Evidence









