Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Intellectual Property in Canada (ipblog.ca)
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Intellectual Property in Canada (ipblog.ca)SCC Decision on Selection Patents
By Richard P.W. Stobbe
ADVERTISEMENTS
In the battles between generic and brand-name pharmaceutical companies, this decision can be considered a major clarification of the law.
Last week the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., 2008 SCC 61. This patent litigation case centres around so-called “selection patents”. Selection patents claim ?an advantage [...]Full post as published by Intellectual Property in Canada (ipblog.ca) on November 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Lawsuits and Settlements
Tainted Spinach
Family awarded settlement after two children became very ill after eating Natural Selection Foods spinach.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Apotex v. Sanofi: SCC Softens Canadian Obviousness Test
Anticipation Without Obviousness
The Intersection of Judicial Attitudes and Litigant Selection Theories
Mossoff on Patents as Property
Aprill: Bilski Means More Uncertainty for Tax Strategy Patents







