Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Kentucky
: Kentucky CasesAttorneys fees and prejudgment interest in USCPA: TENNESSEE FARMERS MUT. INS. CO. v. JONES (COA 9/12/08)
By Michael Stevens
TENNESSEE FARMERS MUTUAL INS. CO. v. JONES
INSURANCE: Attorneys fees and prejudgment interest award affirmed in UCSPA
Claim
2007-CA-000911
Published: Affirming
Panel: Lambert presiding; Dixon, Stumbo Concur
Whitley County
Date Rendered: 9/12/2008
The Court affirmed a circuit court judgment finding personal jurisdiction against the appellant Tennessee insurer and awarding attorney?s fees and prejudgment interest to appellee on a claim for that the insurer violated the Kentucky Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, KRS 304.12-230, related to a claim for personal injuries appellee received in an automobile accident. Appellant insured the Tennessee resident who owned the vehicle driven by the person responsible for the causing collision. The Court held that the trial court did not err in finding personal jurisdiction through Kentucky?s long-arm statute. The accident occurred in Kentucky; appellee, a Kentucky resident, filed her third-party claim in Kentucky; there was no privity of contract between appellee and appellant in any state; and appellant investigated and adjusted the claim in Kentucky. Further, allowing the insurer to ignore a legitimate claimant would under undermine the intent of the UCSPA. The Court then held that the trial court properly awarded appellee attorney?s fees and prejudgment interest under KRS 304.12-235. While the statute was ambiguous on whether interest and attorney fees were available to third-party claimants, KRS 304.12-230 evinced the intent by the legislature to allow for a more expansive reading of the statute. The Court finally held that appellee?s failure to move the trial court for a new trial, precluded the Court from reviewing her argument on cross-appeal that she was entitled to a new trial on damages.
DR filed 10/15/2008 Opinion by Judge Lambert; Judges Dixon and Stumbo concurred.
This digest was taken from the COA's web site with a summary of the September 2008 decisions. Click here for the entire digest.
Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on November 10, 2008 (boomark / email).
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees
How to recover billing errors
Auto Financing
Credit Acceptance Corp. agrees to $52.1 million class action settlement after overcharging consumers for fees and interest on automobile installment contracts.
Becker County
Faces Civil Rights Class Action by Inmates and their Attorneys
Excessive Bank Overdraft Fees
Bank Overdraft Fees alleging excessive fees and misrepresentation of account balances and more.
Federal Government
alleging discrimination against black farmers
Stock Market Losses
alleging bad financial advice and conflicts of interest.
JP Morgan Chase & Co
Faces Lawsuit Over Hikes in Credit Card Interest Rate

Appeals Court Awards Fees in Bad Faith Case
Oh, About Computation of Prejudgment Interest. . .
Prejudgment interest in South Carolina
C.A. Finds that Award for Loss of Competitive Advantage Does Not Attract Prejudgment Interest
Collecting Prejudgement Interest on Debts









