Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal News Blogs -> Lawbeat
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal News
: LawbeatNYT vs. USAT: Is there an echo in here?
By Mark Obbie
ADVERTISEMENTS
Two months after USA Today's Donna Leinwand reported that public defenders in a growing number of states are balking at handling unworkable caseloads, The New York Times' Erik Eckholm reports essentially the same thing. But what a different two months -- and a few other important factors -- can make. Back in September, I dinged the USA Today effort because it hyped a trend that it didn't prove with evidence. Leinwald wrote that "public defenders are being hit so hard by budget cuts and growing caseloads that offices in several states are refusing to take on more cases because they say defendants' rights are being hurt." She supported that with only three examples, two of which involved court challenges -- not so much a refusal as a plea for relief.Now, Eckholm shows that Leinwand was on to something. He focuses on the same case that served as Leinwald's peg -- a court challenge in Miami -- and backs it up with details from seven states, taking care to specify that the PDs in those states are either refusing to take new cases or are challenging their workloads in court. Eckholm's story benefits from two factors out of Leinwand's control: story length and timing. Eckholm's front pager clocks in at more than 1,500 words, more than triple the word count allotted to Leinwand's story. And, since September, the Times reports, more public defenders have gone to court or gone into open revolt. Was I a big old meanie toward Leinwand? No, her story didn't deliver the goods promised in the nut graf. Did the Times rip off USA Today? Not in my view. Inspiration comes in many forms. I'm sure each of the state challenges has been covered locally. Even if Eckholm took his idea directly from the Leinwand piece, he clearly did his own work -- the anecdotes and details are distinctive -- and ultimately did a better job under admittedly favorable conditions. A true ripoff occurs when the thief merely retraces the steps taken in the original -- or, even worse, simply copies the story without attribution. Props to Leinwand and USA Today for spotting a tasty trend first. If only they hadn't taken it out of the oven quite so soon.Full post as published by Lawbeat on November 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

A first sentencing echo from the economic meltdown
Escaping the Web 2.0 Echo Chamber
WA - WHO WILL PROTECT the children from their protectors
LA Crime Spree Worries Silver Lake, Echo Park Residents
What will Drizzle mean for Mysqls dual license model
Christian Brown Design Echo Furniture
Obama: Can We Have a Choice, Not an Echo
Cass Sunstein and Me on Echo Chambers, the Fairness Doctrine, Service Provider Liabiltiy:
Bring Your Child To The Voting Booth: This is America!








