Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> The Law Planet Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: The Law Planet BlogU-5 Reporting - Termination Reasons With a Distinction
By Dobin & Jenks
I was recently retained to represent a client who was both an insurance agent and a registered representative with a related entity. The client was terminated by the insurance company and the broker-dealer. The U-5 that was filed became a problem.
The broker-dealer disclosed on the U-5 that there were two customer complaints from insurance customers regarding fixed insurance products. While this was true that there were two complaints, I felt (actually, I knew but I was being modest) that the disclosure was improper. I wrote to the company and told them to change things.
The company's lawyer wrote back and advised that he felt that the disclosure was proper under U-5 question question 7E(3)(a), which references U-4 question 14I(3)(A). This is essentially a question about the existence of yet-unreported customer complaints. The insurance company/broker-dealer felt that fixed (as opposed to variable) insurance complaints were reportable. I knew they were not.
The FINRA website held the key. FINRA advises that only complaints concerning a security, variable contract that is subject to regulation under the federal securities laws, or commodity exchange product are reportable . Other complaints are not.
There is one caveat, however. If the complaint relates to fixed insurance and alleges forgery, theft, or misappropriation or conversion of funds or securities, then it is reportable on a U-5. This is a slight, but important, difference.
After being educated in their wayward ways, the broker-dealer agreed to arrange to remove the improper disclosures.
That's the view from The Law Planet, Jupiter, Florida.
Full post as published by The Law Planet Blog on November 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Unlawful Retaliation for Sexual Harassment Claim
Title VII retaliatory discharge retaliation requires proof of participation in protected activities
Wrongful Termination
alleging unjust termination of job.
DePuy Metal Hip Replacement
alleging defective product recall of ASR hip implant for health reasons.
Tanning Salon Defamation
WDIO-TV pays undisclosed settlement after reporting false information about a business owner.
Jury Awards $2 Million in Sexual Harassment Wrongful Termination Suit
Jury Awards $2 Million in Sexual Harassment Wrongful Termination Suit
AnchorBank
$1.27 million in construction contract termination lawsuit.
Sprint Nextel
Early Termination Fees Ruled Illegal in California

Consumers have had enough with DirecTV
Librarian fired for reporting porn viewing patron
More on the Is-Ought distinction
Age Discrimination Case: $560,000 in Attorneys Fees
Age Discrimination Case: $560,000 in Attorneys Fees
Sheriffs Department Files Wrongful Termination









