ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> PomTalk

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: PomTalk

Study Finds Wall Street Awash In Conflicts and Insider Deals

By Jeremy Lieberman

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Wall Street Journal recently reported that regulators are investigating whether investment banks engaged in insider trading by purchasing large quantities of shares of target companies when acting as advisors to the purchasers on M&A deals.  The investigations were prompted by a new academic study which found that investment banks purchased shares of these target companies prior to the announcement of a deal with much greater frequency than would normally be expected. 

The study, entitled ?The Dark Role of Investment Banks in the Market for Corporate Control?, was conducted by three European finance professors.  It analyzed more than 1,600  U.S.merger deals between 1984 and 2003, along with quarterly 13F filings of institutional investors.  The study found that during the quarter immediately preceding a merger announcement, investment banks serving as lead advisers to acquirers purchased stock or increased their stake in the target company 19% of the time.  That number is nearly double the 10.5% rate for those banks not serving in advisory roles. 

For example, in September 2006, Motorola, Inc. acquired Symbol Technologies, Inc., a maker of bar-code readers and other devices.  The merger discussions began more than a year earlier, in 2005.  Conveniently, Goldman also purchased over a million shares of Symbol in June 2006.  The study lists countless other examples of other banks engaging in such ?fortuitous? trading. 

Andire Siminov, one of the authors of the study concludes that ?the most probable explanation is that banks are trading on inside information.?  David Yermack, a finance professor at NYU sees serious conflicts of interest in such trading.  ?People doing these mergers hire the banks to be their best agent.  But from the data, it seems that banks are doing what is best for themselves.?

The games get dirtier and dirtier on the ?Street?.

Full post as published by PomTalk on January 14, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0144 secs (new cache)