ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> SCOTUSBLOG

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: SCOTUSBLOG

January arguments, day by day

By Akin Gump Supreme Court Practice Group

ADVERTISEMENTS

The Supreme Court on Monday released the argument calendar (available here) for the session beginning Monday, Jan. 12.  There will be a total of ten arguments during that period; no hearings are set for Jan. 19, a legal holiday, and Jan. 20, presidential inauguration day.  Here are the scheduled arguments, with summaries of the issues:

Mon., Jan. 12

Coeur Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (07-984) and Alaska v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (07-990) — government authority to deposit dredged dirt in waterways

Ministry of Defense of Iran v. Elahi (07-615) — U.S. court’s power to seize assets of a foreign government to pay a debt

Harbison v. Bell (07-8521) — right to use federally funded lawyer to seek clemency in a capital or other criminal case

Tues., Jan. 13

Montejo v. Louisiana (07-1529) — obligation of a suspect to take action to prevent police from questioning him outside the presence of his lawyer

Vermont v. Brillon (08-88) — scope of the speedy trial right for a poor person being represented by a public defender

Knowles v. Mirzayance (07-1315) — defense lawyer’s duty not to withdraw the only defense available — here, an insanity plea

Wed., Jan. 14

Puckett v. U.S. (07-9712) — appeals court’s duty when prosecutors violate a plea bargain, when the violation was not challenged at trial

Boyle v. U.S. (07-1309) — proof required to show an enterprise under the RICO anti-racketeering law

No arguments Jan. 19 or 20

Wed., Jan. 21

Corley v. U.S. (07-10441) — suppression of a voluntary confession made after an arrest on federal charges but before appearing before a magistrate

Kansas v. Ventris (07-1356) — right to use a statement an individual gave to police to challenge testimony given at the trial, if the individual had not waived his right to a lawyer at the time of the statement

Full post as published by SCOTUSBLOG on November 03, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0169 secs (new cache)