Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Womble Trade Secrets Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Womble Trade Secrets BlogFederal Judge Dismisses Invista's Trade Secrets Case Against DuPont, Rhodia
A judge has dismissed a lawsuit by Koch Industries Inc.'s Invista unit against DuPont Co. and France's Rhodia SA over claims they teamed up to steal Invista's proprietary technology for the production of a chemical used in the manufacture of nylon.
In an order dated Thursday, U.S. District Judge Barbara S. Jones in Manhattan dismissed the lawsuit, saying Invista "failed to assert a cognizable federal claim." However, the judge did grant Invista's request to file an amended complaint.
"Invista grounds its claims in state law, not in any substantive provision" of federal law, the judge said. The company failed to plead a valid claim "because it cannot invoke an independent basis for federal jurisdiction," the judge found. (Author's note: we bet that Invista and DuPont are both incorporated in Delaware - meaning that diversity would be destroyed by that mere fact alone.)
In August, Invista sued DuPont and Rhodia, alleging Rhodia was attempting to improperly obtain trade secrets related to Invista's proprietary, butadinene- based technology to produce adiponitrile, an intermediate chemical used in the manufacture of nylon.
Invista had claimed it bought the core technology as part of $4.1 billion sale of DuPont's fibers business in 2004.
The lawsuit claimed DuPont agreed to prohibitions that barred it from competing against Invista and from disclosing the technology to any third party as part of the transaction.
The complaint alleged DuPont had joined forces with Rhodia as Rhodia seeks to build an adiponitrile plant in Asia and compete unfairly against Invista.
Full post as published by Womble Trade Secrets Blog on October 31, 2008 (boomark / email).
Trade Secrets
Former execs are hit with doctrine of inevitable disclosure.
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Trade Secrets
Razorsight agreed to pay $4.5 million settlement in infringement lawsuit.
Newspaper Publisher
Star Tribune must pay St. Paul Pioneer Press a $3.8 million trade secrets act violations settlement.
Environmental Class Action to Proceed Against DuPont
DuPont New Jersey Drinking Water Contamination Class Action to Proceed
Baltimore Strip Search Class Action
Judge Gives Go-ahead
Fire Chief Whistleblower
City of DuPont agrees to $72,000 resignation and severance settlement.
Technician Whistleblower
Jury orders DuPont Chambers Works to pay $1.224 million settlement to employee.

Invista Sues DuPont and Rhodia to Over ADN Trade Secrets
Trade Secrets - Why Federal Court is not Always the Way to Go
INVISTA Sues Rhodia in Delaware for Theft of Trade Secrets
Former partners DuPont, Koch fight over Nylon patents
DuPont sues ex-partner Invista over trade secrets
DuPont accuses Kolon of stealing trade secrets
Think Secrets trade secrets case
COA Dismisses TSPA Claim For Indefinite Pleading
West Legal Education Center Trade Secrets Courses
"Federal judge dismisses suit over torture flights"








