Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> FileWrapper
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: FileWrapperBilski decided
By McKee, Voorhees & Sease, P.L.C.
The decision is available here. It adopts the "machine-or-transformation" test for patentable subject matter. As stated by the majority:
The machine-or-transformation test is a two-branched inquiry; an applicant may show that a process claim satisfies § 101 either by showing that his claim is tied to a particular machine, or by showing that his claim transforms an article.
Click below for some quotes from the majority opinion. We'll have a more complete analysis soon.
[More]
Full post as published by FileWrapper on October 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bilski: Much Ado About (almost) Nothing
Ex Parte Bilski: Once Again Rethinking the Scope of Patentable Subject Matter
Business Method Patents Under Review
A Madness to its Method: Cert Petition Filed in Bilski
Liveblogging: How Did We Get to Bilski and What Can We Do About It
Bilski and Continued Uncertainty in Patent Subject Matter








