ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Barrister

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Barrister

Assessing The Assessors

By Abdul Hakim-Shabazz

ADVERTISEMENTS

Current Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard and former Mayor Bart Peterson are having a news conference today to promote the consolidation of the township assessor functions into the county assessor.  So in that spirit, I’m reprinting a letter  a listener to my morning radio show sent me in support of consolidation.

Consistency Trumps Accuracy in Assessing Property

Don?t let the Township Assessors confuse the issue, on the matter of consolidating assessing duties, with their claims of better accuracy.

The most important factor in fairly allocating the property tax burden is CONSISTANCY of assessments.  For example, it is better to have a single assessing official over assess every property by 100% than to have 10 assessing official with some over assessing by 10% and others under assessing by 10%.   Fair allocation of the tax burden depends ENTIRELY on assessment consistency.

Granted, if every property were over assessed by 100%…that would generate other problems?particularly a flood of appeals?but you get the point!

Finally, the other important benefit to eliminating Township Assessors is it is a step toward aggregation of taxing districts.  Frankly, I?m not sure how much can be ?saved? by reducing the number of elected officials and there offices?but I don?t really care!  What I care about is reducing the number of taxing districts!!!  Too many taxing districts carves the tax base into too many small pieces.  These small pieces often distort tax burdens?some districts with tax rates that are much too high (others too low).  Larger taxing districts provide a  more robust tax base and, generally, allow gov?t services to be funded at a more ?reasonable? tax rate for all.

There is no defensible logic behind the current taxing district structure that has property tax rates inside the IPS school district nearly 50% higher than the property tax rates outside the IPS school district.  There are many reasons for this differential?but this result is fundamentally flawed on its face.  This is why the property tax caps are not only good politics?but good policy.

I’ll be more than happy to print the township assessors’ point of view if they send me one.

Full post as published by Indiana Barrister on October 30, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0127 secs (new cache)