Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation BlogChancery Grants Motion To Intervene in Contested Stock Issuance Case
By Francis G. X. Pileggi, Esq.
Noe v. Kropf, 2008 Del. Ch. LEXIS 148 (Oct. 15, 2008), is a Chancery Court decision that discusses the factors under Chancery Court Rule 24 applicable to a motion to intervene. This case involved a shareholder who sought to intervene because the original plaintiff was requesting from the Court a declaration that the stock owned by the intervenor and issued by a contested board was void. The intervenor/shareholder was Turnaround Advisors, LLC.
The Court observed that Rule 24 provides for both discretionary and mandatory intervention. This case fell into Rule 24(a) because intervention was warranted as a matter of right. In order to be eligible for either mandatory or discretionary intervention, however, one must first have standing. The Court reasoned that even though the intervenor 's shares were issued after the date that the contested board was elected, the intervenor should have standing to allow it to establish the legitimacy of the board that issued its shares in order for it to prove that its shares were validly issued by the board. In addition, the Court was concerned that no other party would be representing the interests of the intervenor if intervention was denied.
The original complaint sought relief under DGCL section 225 (to determine whether the election of a board was valid) and section 227 (to determine the votings rights of those who claim to own stock).
The Court also granted a motion to vacate a prior order to expedite the proceedings to allow time for the intervenor to engage in discovery, but the Court expected the parties to agree to a new accelerated timetable in light of a Section 225 case being an expedited proceeding.
Full post as published by Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog on October 27, 2008 (boomark / email).
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
AireSurf Networks Holdings Inc.
$23,147 debt settlement made by issuance of 115,735 common shares.
MRV Communications, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
MRV Communications, Inc. 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Texron Inc 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Texron Inc 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
MGM Mirage 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
MGM Mirage 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Rentech, Inc, 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Rentech, Inc, 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
PrivateBancorp, Inc 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
PrivateBancorp, Inc 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud

ADF-allied attorneys set to back Florida fair funding referendum
Defective Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law
Missouri's Courts Allow Interested Parties to Join Lawsuits Through What is Called Intervention
Nevada Supreme Court denies Catillo's motion to intervene
Court of Chancery Denies Jurisdiction Over Stock Appreciation Rights Suit
Court of Chancery Establishes Procedures for Contested Advancement Claims
Leg. Commission on Courts of Chancery meets 4/29








