ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation

By Jim Hamilton

ADVERTISEMENTS



New FSA Chair Says Securitization Here to Stay but Must Return to Its Roots

Securitization will survive the current market crisis, in the view of new UK Financial Services Authority Chair Adair Turner, but the process must be reformed back to the original idea of securitizing assets on bank balance sheets for sale to investors in transparent simple instruments held to maturity. Also, there must be fewer layers of intermediation and trading. In remarks at the International Banking Seminar in Washington, he said that the original reason for securitization remains valid, namely taking accumulating credit assets off bank balance sheets and distributing them directly to end investors who can select desired risk return combinations and thereby reduce the concentration of risks on particular intermediary balance sheets. At the end of the day, a return to on-balance sheet lending is probably not in the cards.

In his view, securitization morphed into something much more complex, opaque and risky. Securities were packaged and structured and sliced. Derivatives were used to lay off risks, with huge unsettled counterparty exposures. And, even more defeating to the original idea, a large proportion of the securities were not in fact passed through to end hold-to-maturity investors but held and traded on the balance sheets of banks and on the off balance sheets of banks through conduits and in the highly leveraged balance sheets of investment banks.

He emphasized that regulatory regimes must now demand more capital in financial intermediation, both via higher capital requirements for banks and more effective steps to prevent highly leveraged shadow banking entities, such as the conduits, escaping capital regimes. Indeed, he predicted that the highly-leveraged shadow banks will largely disappear. There must also be more focus on liquidity prudential regimes, whether through principles and regulatory review and regulatory discretion, or via quantitative rules.

Full post as published by Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation on October 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0048 secs (from cache 11/06/26 11:35:01)