Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Class Action
: The UCL PractitionerNew opinion on collateral estoppel in class action cases: Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
By Kimberly A. Kralowec
In Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Sept. 19, 2008), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) expressed a great deal of skepticism about the legal underpinnings of a notorious decision from 2006 on the operation of collateral estoppel in the class action context, Alvarez v. May Department Stores Co., 143 Cal.App.4th 1223 (2006) (see this blog post for more on Alvarez). The Complex Litigator has more on Johnson in this post.
Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on October 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Bextra Injury Risks
Bextra Increases Risk of Fatal Heart Attack
Johnson & Johnson 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Johnson & Johnson 401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
GlaxoSmithKline Pays $750 Million Over Defective Drugs
GlaxoSmithKline Pays $750 Million Over Defective Drugs
Salmonella Found in Tomotoes
57 Reported Cases in New Mexico and Texas
ConAgra Peanut Butter
Hundreds of Salmonella Cases Settled
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
SJS, Stevens Johnson Syndrome
alleging that certain drugs cause this deadly skin inflammation.

We're Depressed: Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline
Antitrust Suit against GlaxoSmithKline Certified Class Action
Plea to a traffic ticket not collateral estoppel in a federal criminal case
Alabama Supreme Court can only review grounds accepted on certiorari
Yet Another Take on Collateral Estoppel in Attorney Fee Arbitrations








