ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Class Action Blogs -> The UCL Practitioner

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Class Action

: The UCL Practitioner

New opinion on collateral estoppel in class action cases: Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.

By Kimberly A. Kralowec

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Sept. 19, 2008), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) expressed a great deal of skepticism about the legal underpinnings of a notorious decision from 2006 on the operation of collateral estoppel in the class action context, Alvarez v. May Department Stores Co., 143 Cal.App.4th 1223 (2006) (see this blog post for more on Alvarez). The Complex Litigator has more on Johnson in this post.

Full post as published by The UCL Practitioner on October 09, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0278 secs (new cache)