Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Seattle Trademark LawyerFederal Trademark Office Launches "Consistency Initiative"
By Michael Atkins
Ever file three trademark applications with only slight variations, only to get three different examining attorneys arrive at three different decisions?
That kind of result is what the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office hopes to avoid.
On Sept. 29, it announced a “Consistency Initiative,” which will enable applicants to request a “consistency review” when the PTO handles an application differently than a similar pending application or registration.
Here’s the official word:
“In an effort to further improve quality, the Office has created a centralized process by which an applicant may bring to the attention of the Office situations where, in applicant’s opinion, the Office has acted inconsistently in its treatment of applicant’s pending applications/recent registration(s). Specifically, applicants may submit a Request for Consistency Review when a substantive or procedural issue (excluding any issues involving identifications of goods and services) has been addressed in a significantly different manner in different cases, subject to the following provisions: (1) the request is based on co-pending applications or an application and a registration owned by the same legal entity or a successor in interest (e.g., assignee); (2) the registration(s) involved was issued less than one year prior to the date of the request; (3) at least one of the applications in the request is in a pre-publication status at the time of the request; and (4) the allegedly inconsistent treatment has already occurred.”
Applicants should send requests to tmconsistency@uspto.gov. The PTO promises action within four-to-six weeks.
The institution of the initiative does not prevent applicants from raising the issue of inconsistent treatment with the assigned examining attorney. In fact, the PTO encourages such contact.
The PTO is conducting the initiative as a one-year pilot.
Here’s to consistent treatment!
Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on October 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Federal Adoption Tax Credit
Financial Incentive for Adoptive Parents
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
TEA-21 - Plus Law 105-178
Adidas Imitators
Payless Shoesource to pay $304.6 million settlement in trademark lawsuit.
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
OfficeMax Recalls Office Chairs Due to Fall Hazard
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
West Virginia Child Advocate Office Faces Class Action over Child Support
Office Politics
Ramsey County pays two deputies $750,000 settlement after being placed in dead end jobs.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Taylor Bean Faces Federal WARN Class Action
Taylor Bean Federal Employment Class Action Filed

USPTO announces trademark consistency pilot program
USPTO Starts Trademark Consistency Initiative
ADF Launches Initiative to Retake Religious Freedom
IRS Launches Political Activity Compliance Initiative for 2008 Election
Domain Name URL Does Not Infringe Trademark









