Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime and Consequences
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime and ConsequencesArguing over Arguing
By Kent Scheidegger et al.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Here is one more nugget from yesterday's SCOTUS orders list. In the Rhode Island Indian law case of Carcieri v. Kempthorne, No. 07-526, the Court denied all the motions for divided argument. Tony Mauro at BLT has this post over the "massive impasse" that has resulted. Will Rhode Island and the Town of Charleston be represented by the lawyer who has handled the case for 10 years or SCOTUS veteran and former SG Ted Olson? Will the other side (the federal government and the tribe) be represented by the SG or Tom Goldstein? It will be interesting to see how that shakes out.Full post as published by Crime and Consequences on October 07, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

"Arguing Over Argument Time in D.C. Gun Case"
On arguing in the Sixth Circuit on Tuesday
AIPLA Submits Amicus Brief in Bilski Case, Arguing for Broad Patentable Subject Matter
We're Still Arguing Over Hurricane Katrina's Causes
Are temporary federal unemployment program extensions really all that temporary








