Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> The FCPA Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: The FCPA BlogCase Closed For Kay And Murphy
The U.S. Supreme Court will not review the Fifth Circuit's decisions in U.S. v. Kay, the Justices said yesterday. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act convictions of David Kay and Douglas Murphy cannot be further appealed and the two must now serve their prison sentences -- 37 months for Kay and 63 months for Murphy.The former executives of American Rice, Inc. were found guilty in 2005 of bribing Haitian officials in order to reduce their company's taxes. They argued all along that the FCPA didn't apply to bribes to reduce taxes, or that if it applied, the "obtaining or retaining" language in the law (the business nexus element) is so ambiguous that enforcement in their case would be unfair. The Justice's denied the petition for certiorari after a review at their Sept. 29, 2008 docket conference.
The lower court's view of the FCPA, left undisturbed by the Supreme Court, is important for at least a few reasons:
First, the Fifth Circuit said any payments to foreign officials that might assist in obtaining or retaining business by lowering the costs of operations can fall within the FCPA.Denial of cert is terrible news for Kay and Murphy and a personal tragedy for them. For the rest of us, it means the Justice Department's so-called "expansive enforcement" of the FCPA will continue. Compliance programs need to be expansive as well, aimed not just at bribes intended to help land business directly from foreign governments but extending also to any overseas public bribery that might create a commercial advantage. That includes payments to reduce taxes or speed up refunds, jump customs queues, obtain favorable product inspections, manipulate business registrations, alter rates or delivery times of national carriers, reduce utility costs, and enhance property usage -- to name just a few.Second, the Fifth Circuit emphatically did not think enforcing the statute against Kay and Murphy would be unfair, even if the business nexus element is a bit ambiguous. "A man of common intelligence," it ruled, "would have understood that . . . in bribing foreign officials, [Kay and Murphy were] treading close to a reasonably-defined line of illegality. . . . Defendants took this risk, and splitting hairs . . . does not allow them to argue successfully that the FCPA?s standards were vague."
And third, the court said the government can satisfy the "knowing" element of an FCPA offense by showing merely that the defendants understood that their actions were illegal. No specific knowledge about the FCPA and its prohibitions is required.
View the U.S. Supreme Court's Oct. 6, 2008 Orders List here.
View our prior posts about U.S. v. Kay here.
.
Full post as published by The FCPA Blog on October 06, 2008 (boomark / email).
Murphy City, TX
$255,000 settlement in controversial pedophile news program case.
Pork BBQ Products Recalled
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct 20 that the Murphy House in Louisburg, N...
Safety Violations
Murphy Oil USA Inc. to pay $179,100 settlement in occupational safety violations lawsuit.
Gleevec
Possible Case of Kidney Damage Reported
Hampton Inn
Third Case of Legionnaires' Disease Linked to McHenry Hampton Inn Hot Tub
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000
18-Wheeler Accident Case Settled for $600,000

Taxpayer Files Reply Brief in Murphy
Massachusetts Judge in Hot Water over Letters in Libel Case
Boston Judge Agrees to Step Down Over Letters Sent to Herald
Implicit Waiver of Counsel at Trial
Germain Critiques Taxpayer's Reply Brief in Murphy
Rep. Chris Murphy on Gas Prices







