ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Malpractice Blogs -> New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Legal Malpractice

: New York Attorney Malpractice Blog

CPLR 3211 and 3212 Motions in Legal Malpractice

By (Andrew Lavoott Bluestone)

ADVERTISEMENTS

Plaintiff unsuccessfully defended a CPLR 3211 motion brought by attorney group number 1 in a legal malpractice case.  Plaintiff was represented by group 1 and then mid-stream terminated them and moved to attorney group 2, who successfully settled the case.  In KWANGJIN SONG, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP AND ROBERT S. ATTARDO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.  2008 NY Slip Op 7312; 2008SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT.

On Appeal, the Appellate Division, 4th Department affirmed, but on different reasoning.  "We affirm, although our reasoning differs from that of the court with respect to the underlying basis for the dismissal of the complaint. We conclude that defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3212 rather than dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). Defendants met their burden by establishing as a matter of law that they, inter alia, were not negligent and that plaintiff sustained no damages, two essential elements of a legal malpractice cause of action (see Oot v Arno, 275 AD2d 1023, 713 N.Y.S.2d 382), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Ginther v Heim [appeal No. 1], AD3d , 2008 NY Slip Op 7430, 2008 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7303 [Oct. 3, 2008]; Oot, 275 AD2d at 1024). With respect to the first counterclaim, defendants submitted evidence establishing the reasonable value of their services (see generally Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon v Chu, 240 AD2d 231, 659 N.Y.S.2d 4), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to defendants' entitlement to the fees sought (see generally DiPlacidi v Walsh, 243 AD2d 335, 664 N.Y.S.2d 537; [**3] Pirro & Monsell v Freddolino, 204 AD2d 613, 614 N.Y.S.2d 232, lv dismissed 85 N.Y.2d 903, 650 N.E.2d 1319, 627 N.Y.S.2d 318). "
 

Full post as published by New York Attorney Malpractice Blog on October 07, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0153 secs (new cache)