Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Patent Docs
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Patent DocsInequitable Conduct Standard Remains Fluid in Praxair v. ATMI
By Donald Zuhn, Kevin Noonan, Chris Singer, Sherri Oslick, and Jason Derry
ADVERTISEMENTS
By Kevin E. Noonan -- The Federal Circuit's inequitable conduct jurisprudence has appeared for some time to be unduly fact- and panel-dependent, straying in the opinion of at least Judge Rader from the principle enunciated in the Court's en banc decision in Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. v. Hollister, Inc., 863 F.2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988), that a finding of inequitable conduct should be rare and the evidentiary requirements satisfy a "high bar." This trend continues in Praxair, Inc. v. ATMI, Inc., where the Court affirmed a finding of inequitable conduct as to one patent-in-suit, but reversed as to another, based...Full post as published by Patent Docs on October 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Wrongful Death
alleging death was caused by the conduct of negligent defendant.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

ATMI, Praxair settle patent litigation
Indefiniteness is a Matter of Claim Construction
Praxair gets a win at CAFC in ATMI case
Important Inequitable Conduct Decision: Defendant Must Prove its Case







