ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog

Product Liability Claims Involving Byetta

ADVERTISEMENTS


Three new lawsuits were filed in the state of California in September concerning the injectable diabetes drug Byetta. The lawsuits allege design defect and inadequate warnings of the drug?s alleged links to pancreatitis. The lawsuits name the manufacturer, Amylin, and the marketer, Eli Lilly, as the named defendants in the suit.

Byetta is a injectable drug for adult Type 2 diabetes. The principle ingredients of the drug are a derivative of the saliva of the Gila Monster, a lizard found in the southwestern United States. According to public information, approximately 1 million patients have used Byetta since it went on the market in June of 2005. The lawsuits pending against the named defendants are alleging that the defendants concealed from the public the extent of their knowledge concerning the possible linkage between the use of the drug and acute pancreatitis. In December, 2007, the United States Food and Drug Administration issued a Safety Alert indicating 30 reports of acute pancreatitis in connection with the use of this drug. In August, the FDA supplemented this safety alert by indicating an additional 6 adverse reports of pancreatitis.

If you or a loved one have used this drug and have developed acute pancreatitis, obviously, you may wish to confer with counsel concerning your legal rights. If the manufacturers were aware of a documented linkage between acute pancreatitis and the use of this drug, to the extent that they did not include warnings of this link to pancreatitis, there may be the valid basis of a claim against these defendants for a failure to warn of known dangers.

Full post as published by Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog on October 02, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0154 secs (new cache)