Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Crime & Federalism
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Crime & FederalismExperimental Philosophy
ADVERTISEMENTS
One thing I never liked about philosophy is that, for lack of a better phrase, it allowed you to make shit up. Come up with an idea, make some good arguments, there that's that. There is a minority movement seek reform. They are calling themselves experimental philosophers, and this excellent overview chronicles their efforts.
Though the article doesn't mention it, here is one problem I saw with Rawls' original position argument. John Rawls argued that, from behind a veil of ignorance, people would want to create a strong system procedural justice. Since no person would know what his lot in life would be, he'd want to guarantee equal opportuny.
Really? How did he come up with that "person"? He just made it up, of course...continue to full postFull post as published by Crime & Federalism on October 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Experimental Philosophy and Experimental Syntax (J. Stanley)
Quick Introduction to Experimental (Situationist) Philosophy
Well-Informed Article on Experimental Philosophy...
Kripke Responds to the Challenge of Experimental Philosophy
Experimental Philosophy on Bloggingheads TV!
Anthropologist Encounters Experimental Philosophy...









