Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Environmental Law Blogs -> ESA Blawg
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Environmental Law
: ESA BlawgFWS seeking information on piping plovers for 5-year review
By Keith W. Rizzardi
73 Fed. Reg. 56860, 73 FR 56860-56862, Vol. 73, No. 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)(DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; Fish and Wildlife Service; FWS–R3–ES–2008–N0235; 30120–1113–0000 C4; 50120–1113–0000 C4; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Review; Notice of initiation of review; request for information on the piping plover (Charadrius melodus).)
Photo of an adult piping plover from the Atlantic Coast population FWS webpage. According to an FWS fact sheet, intensive protection has helped the population more than double during the 1986-2006 period, but the most recent surveys place the Atlantic population at fewer than 2,000 pairs.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), initiate 5-year reviews of the piping plover (Atlantic Coast, Great Lakes, and Northern Great Plains populations) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We request any new information on these populations that may have a bearing on their classification as endangered or threatened. Based on the results of these 5-year reviews, we will make a finding on whether these populations are properly classified under the Act.
KEITHINKING: Note that information is sought no later than December 1, 2008, so, in theory, a 5-year review, and a proposed new rulemaking in response to the review, could be forthcoming in December.
EXCERPT: What Information Do We Consider in Our Review? In our 5-year review, we consider all new information available at the time of the review. These reviews will consider the best scientific and commercial data that have become available since the original listing determination or most recent status review of each species, such as—(A) Species biology, including but not limited to population trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics; (B) Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount, distribution, and suitability; (C) Conservation measures that have been implemented to benefit the species; (D) Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ‘‘How do we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened?’’); and (E) Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of erroneous information contained in the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants, and improved analytical methods.
Full post as published by ESA Blawg on September 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Sex Offender Lists
Registries by State and County
Underground Piping
Insituform Technologies awarded $4.5 million patent infringement settlement.
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
82 Year Old
Awarded $6 Million in SJS Lawsuit
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Chicago Golf Course
101 Year Old Owner Must Get $25 Million for Property
FDA Review of Prostate Cancer Treatment Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes
Prostate Cancer Treatment FDA Review Prompts Warning of Risk for Diabetes

Law Review Article Submission Resources
A New Look at the Internet Effect
Jury Verdict : National Oilwell Vargo, LP v. A&B Bolt & Supply Inc. et al







