Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: inversecondemnation2007 Land Use in Review: Venue in Declaratory Actions on Legality of Agency Rules is Jurisdictional
By rht
In Hawaii Home Infusion Assoc. v. Befitel, (No. 27256, Apr. 16, 2007), the Hawaii Supreme Court held that the venue provisions in the declaratory judgment section of the Hawaii Administrative Procedures Act, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 91-7, are jurisdictional, and such actions must be brought in the judicial circuit in which the petitioner is domiciled. Find out why this decision is important in the land use arena by reading this post.
Full post as published by inversecondemnation on January 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Collection Agencies and Creditors
How to deal and stop the harassment
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Lexus Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales Inc.
allegedly failed to correct problems with the front passenger air bag system in thousands of 2007 Lexus ES350 vehicles.
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Trailers Contain Toxic Formaldehyde Fumes
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services
Aurora Loan Faces Class Action over Mortgage Review Services

Corps Jurisdictional Determinations are not Final Agency Actions under APA
New Trademark Blog and Declaratory Judgments
Stuart Taylor, Jr. on telecom immunity
New IRS Whistleblower Rules Are Issued by U.S. Tax Court
Why Did the Supreme Court Punt on a Jurisdictional Issue









