Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> inversecondemnation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: inversecondemnation2007 Land Use in Review: Due Process Notice in Eminent Domain
By rht
Several cases focused on the issue of due process notice in eminent domain. In Divine v Town of Nantucket, 449 Mass. 499, ___ N.E.2d ___ (July 19, 2007), the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts invalidated the town's 1968 exercise of eminent domain since the town's taking listed the owners of the property as "owners unknown," which was not sufficient notice to the landowner. In Brody v. Village of Port Chester, No. 00 Civ. 7481 (HB) (SDNY, July 18, 2007), a New York federal court held that a municipality wrongfully exercised eminent domain and denied the landowner procedural due process by not providing proper notice of his right to contest the taking.
Full post as published by inversecondemnation on January 08, 2008 (boomark / email).
Income Tax Changes for 2007
Get Answers to your Income Tax Questions
Landfill Eminent Domain
Surry County pays $800,000 settlement to purchase farm land for town dump.
Eminent Domain
University of Akron pays property owner $443,000 settlement.
The Plainfield School District
$10,500 settlement resolves eminent domain dispute.
Downtown Improvement
Springfield to pay more than $2.5 million settlement in eminent domain lawsuit.
Condo Eminent Domain
Maui pays $4.1 million settlement to property owner.
Stadium Eminent Domain
City of Arlington agrees to $2 million Dallas Cowboys stadium settlement.

Hollywood and Eminent Domain Abuse
The Current State of Post-Kelo Eminent Domain Reform
Why RLUIPA Should not be Amended to Regulate Eminent Domain Actions Against Religious Property
Eminent Domain in New Jersey Seminar: April 17, 2008








