ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IMPACT

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IMPACT

Spore Copyright Saga

ADVERTISEMENTS

Earlier this month, the video game maker Electronic Arts ("EA") released the much anticipated "Spore" video game in the UK, but was promptly attacked by thousands of Spore fans on Amazon.com who found that their private use of the game was substantially curtailed by EA's copyright restrictions in the game software.

"Spore" is a creation of Mr Will Wright, the designer of the successful "The Sims" video games.  Spore's unique selling point is that it allows players to use tools to help the evolution of their creations from mere microscopic organisms to intelligent and social life forms which can then master their surroundings and travel through space, constantly evolving at every venture.

However, for many Spore enthusiasts, the nurture of that evolution was squashed by the Digital Rights Management system employed by EA which restricted the number of times the game could be installed on personal computers.  An EA spokesman commented earlier this month that its system "works just like online music services that limit the number of machines on which you can play a song" and that system "is an effort to control piracy".

The current position in the saga is that EA has relaxed the copyright protection for Spore and the user restriction has been raised from three to five computers which EA believes ought to account for all legitimate uses. See the online BBC report earlier this week:  EA also plans to allow five screen (or user) names per copy of the game in the future.  These moves ought to now appease the avid Spore game player.

The Spore saga has certainly demonstrated the market considerations that a games manufacturer needs to take into account when balancing the need to combat piracy and protect copyright with the reasonable consumer's realistic expectations about the product.

The balance will no doubt be dictated by how far a games manufacturer can commercially exploit its product through copyright protection without drawing in complaints that would ultimately serve to damage the repute of the product.

Full post as published by IMPACT on September 24, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0142 secs (new cache)