ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Spy Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: Spy Blog

Draft Constitutional Reform Bill Clause 43

ADVERTISEMENTS

As we get further disillusioned with what passes for effective Parliamentary scrutiny of this Government's never ending output of ever more complicated legislation, which seems to be a substitute for actually achieving anything positive, we did notice that some of our worries about the Draft Constitutional Reform Bill are shared by some other people

Joint Committee on the Constitutional Renewal Bill report

CLAUSE 43

361._One particular issue of Parliamentary accountability arises in clause 43 of the Draft Bill which allows the Minister by affirmative order to "make such provision as [he] consider[s] appropriate in consequence of this Act". Under clause 43(2) that order may "amend, repeal, or revoke any provision made by or under any Act".

362._Democratic Audit told us the purpose of clause 43 needed clarifying. They argued that even if the provision were limited to amending this Act, "any alterations should require full Parliamentary procedure". (Ev04, para 6) The Justice Committee recommended that we look at "the totality of the provisions of the Bill, considers whether any of them could be made more specific in order to reduce the area in which Clause 43(1) would operate."[192] The Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRR) told us that the order-making power "should expressly be confined to the amendment of Acts passed before or in the same session as the bill." DPRR also recommended that "it should be made clear whether incidental or supplementary provision may be made under subsection (1) of clause 43." (Ev70, para 6)

363._We agree with the House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee that the power in clause 43 (to make consequential provision) should be limited to the amendment of Acts passed before or in the same session as the Bill.

We await any actual Government amendments to this Bill, with a sense of increasing resentment and frustration.

Thanks to a recent email correspondent, for reminding us about this. We had actually seen this when it was published online, but could not summon up enough enthusiasm to write a blog article about, what, after all, is only a Committee Report, of the sort which is usually ignored by this Government.

See also:

Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill - short call for evidence by June 12th 2008

and

Danger ! Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill Part 6 tries to remove even the limited constitutional safeguards of the "destroy Parliament" Legislative and Regulatory Reform Act 2006

Full post as published by Spy Blog on August 13, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0125 secs (new cache)