Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Neuroethics and Law
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Neuroethics and LawLawrence Farwell Responds at the Neuroethics & Law Blog
By Adam Kolber
ADVERTISEMENTS
Lawrence Farwell responds to my post on brain-based lie detection here. He notes that while the Herald Tribune makes it sound as though the BEOS tests used in India and his brain fingerprinting technique are similar, he argues that they are different in important ways. See his comment for more.
Full post as published by Neuroethics and Law on September 11, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Vol.1, Issue #2 of Neuroethics
The Transposition Fallacy in Brown v. Farwell
Iacoboni Responds to Neuropolitics Criticism
Neuroethics-Related Book Reviews








