Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Support Blogs -> The Trial Technologist's View
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation Support
: The Trial Technologist's ViewCombating Biased Evidence / Images
By Blake Boyd
The use of photographic evidence is always the best way to prove your point, if you have the correct photo. Experienced photographers use different angles to make subject’s sizes, proportions and distances look different then they really are.
This photograph was produced by opposing counsel. The question in this lawsuit was: If the machine was using the full shoulder, would it have prevented a head on collision by a passing car and incoming truck? This photograph was taken by the opposing expert, and we knew they would rely on this picture to show that it would have never made a difference.

What do you think? How much space is available? A foot left on the shoulder? Three feet to the middle line?
You might be surprised… It took 4 of us studying the CAD drawing that was produced (so complicated a average juror would not be able to discern), to realize that there is much more space than the picture depicts.

We explained the distances in a 3 step process. First showing all 3 distances (shoulder, to middle, point of impact) then using a easel and pad to hand write the distances if the machine had traveled on the shoulder.



I think it even surprised opposing counsel, and I know for sure it was eye opening to the jury. The photos had been shown over and over before actually showing the pictures with a graphic overlay. We had talked about the numbers, looked at the numbers, even created a drawing with the numbers, but nothing compares to actually seeing them in a reconstruction photograph.

Always be sure to study your main photographic evidence. In situations such as this, a photograph could be used against you unjustly. If the pictures would have never been showed with numbers overlayed, the jury might have never been able to comprehend the point. And the point is: If the machine would have used the entire shoulder there would have been almost 9′ for the person to pass (without having to travel into the oncoming traffics lane).
A couple more photographs we added overlays to:




Full post as published by The Trial Technologist's View on August 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Getty Images
Faces Class Action over Premium Access
NCAA
Faces Antitrust Class Action over use of Players' Images

Combating Terrorism Center at West Point Report on al-Qa'ida
New GAO Reports on Combating Terrorism
New GAO Reports: Combating Terrorism, Rebuilding Iraq, Veterans Affairs
New GAO Reports: Combating Terrorism, Defense Acquisitions, Disconnected Youth, Homeland Security
New GAO Reports: Combating Nuclear Smuggling, NATO Enlargement, Secure Border Initiative









