ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Ethics

: Legal Ethics Forum

Inadvertent Receipt and Firm-Wide Disqualification

ADVERTISEMENTS

Interesting case, depending on which set of facts you base your result on: the majority reasoned that if a lawyer at a firm inadvertently receives privileged documents and doesn't do as is required under state law -- notify and return -- that the entire firm as a matter of law is disqualified. The concurring opinion, though, laid out the facts more fully, and it's clear that at least two, and probably more, lawyers reviewed the documents and the firm claimed privilege over the extent of the internal disclosure, and so for that reason firm-wide disqualification was in order. The case, Greenberg Taurg v. Atlas Air, Inc., __ So.2d __ (Fla. App. Sept. 17, 2008), is here.

Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on September 18, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0124 secs (new cache)