ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

Random Thoughts on the Financial State of Affairs

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

I have been traveling all week, but trying to keep up with the biggest U.S. government bailout since, well, since Wednesday.  Thanks to the rest of the Glom for keeping us all informed ("the depression will be liveblogged").

Is this bailout a good idea?  That's the question I was asked by my fellow conferees at my non-corporate conference.  My answer has to be "compared to what?" as my friend David Hyman likes to say.  The market seems to think it's a good idea, but that could be short-sighted.  However, not being a macroeconomist, I can only guess that the alternative was worse than the (attempted) cure.  Is it a great thing to have the federal government increase the national debt (in a time of a very expensive war) to bailout private institutions with taxpayer money?  No.  Would the market be able to right itself, after breaking more than a few Wall Streeg eggs, eventually?  Not sure.

Do either of the candidates seem to know what's going on?  No.  As little as I know, the candidates seem to know less.  What with McCain calling for Chris Cox's resignation (huh?) and Obama saying the AIG bailout was necessary to protect AIG's insurance policy holders (who are not at risk), it seems clear that a little information can be dangerous.

Is restricting short selling a good idea?  Before the bailout began, there had been an outcry to regulate "speculation" more heavily.  Short selling, particularly naked short selling, is an easy target for those who think that speculation (as opposed to investing and hedging) makes the markets more volatile and produces inefficient pricing.  However, that thesis is far from proven or accepted -- but the rhetoric seems to work with the public and the regulators.  If there is any time to restrict short selling, it would be when the markets are in freefall and there is some sort of "snowball" effect -- similar to reasons why trading is suspended from time to time.  However, I would think that the window for this would be very short (not two weeks), similar to a temporary suspension in trading.  In both hedging and speculation, there is a winner and a loser, and picking and choosing when to favor the loser is usually indefensible.

What's the easiest prediction to make from the financial crisis?  More law school applicants.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on September 22, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.002 secs (from cache 10/31/26 05:20:18)