Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> PomTalk
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: PomTalkNew Rule: Comments Not Required, Effective Immediately
By Fei-Lu Qian
On September 17, 2008, the SEC announced new rules effective immediately, to protect investors against ?naked? short selling abuses. According to the SEC press release, the new rules require:
that short sellers and their broker-dealers deliver securities by the close of business on the settlement date (three days after the sale transaction date, or T+3) and imposing penalties for failure to do so.
If a short sale violates this close-out requirement, then any broker-dealer acting on the short seller's behalf will be prohibited from further short sales in the same security unless the shares are not only located but also pre-borrowed. The prohibition on the broker-dealer's activity applies not only to short sales for the particular naked short seller, but to all short sales for any customer.
Even though the new rules are effective immediately, the SEC is seeking comments for a period of 30 days. As correctly noted in a fellow blog, the SEC sudden action looks like a panic without ?justifications for avoiding the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act? which ?requires agencies to propose rules, provide an opportunity for comment, and wait at least 30 days before they become effective.? Moreover, the SEC did not invoke the APA?s ?good cause? exception to immediately adopt these rules.
Full post as published by PomTalk on September 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Employment Contracts
General Contract Law Principles
Miralus Inc.
alleging HeadOn is not safe or effective.
DUI/DWI
If you have been arrested for drunk driving or driving under the influence you should contact an attorney immediately.
No Signature Required
Wachovia to pay up to $125 million settlement in check cashing lawsuit.
Walt Disney
alleging a Sikh American applied for a job with Disney but was told he did not have the "Disney look" - apparently referring to his beard and turban, which is required by his religion.

Filing a New Case After Denial
Why I oppose the HHS conscience rule
REPORT ON PROPOSED RULE 2.2 FROM THE ISBA 2007 ANNUAL MEETING
The New FTC Franchise Disclosure Rule
Missouri Lawyers: New Expert Rule, Effective January, 2009









