Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> Criminal Review
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: Criminal ReviewR. v. Mulroney
ADVERTISEMENTS
As you know, I don’t usually link to “over 80″ cases, even though they are the bread and butter of many a practice, because I don’t find them very interesting. As an example of the kind of thing that goes on, here we have the case of a fellow who blew into a breathalyzer (the Intoxilyzer, to be precise) but apparently not “directly” (as required by the Criminal Code).
In dismissing the application for a non-suit, the learned trial judge referred to the word ?d read more
Full post as published by Criminal Review on September 19, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Defending Against Mulroney-Schreiber
Constitutional Scholar Gérald Beaudoin Passes Away
New Books at the Law Library - May 26th, 2008
Some Political Drama in the Conflict of Laws in Canada








