ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates

TV Giants are Flatliners in Stereo 3-D Patents

By Philip Brooks

ADVERTISEMENTS

Rick Merritt writes in today's, September 18, 2008, EE Times:

The world's top television makers appear to hold no significant patents in stereoscopic 3-D despite the fact that some of the largest Hollywood studios want to drive the concept of 3DTV into the market. LG, Matsushita, Samsung, Sony and Toshiba currently have no significant patents on stereo 3-D, according to an initial patent search by EE Times.

Hollywood studios want to help set a standard for 3DTV so they can sell home versions of the increasing number of 3-D movies they are creating for the cinema. Some observers say stereo 3-D could be the next big thing in television beyond today's high definition flat panel systems. Others say the technology is far from ready for prime time.

Some 184 patents come up on a search of the U.S. patent office Web site for stereoscopic 3-D. About half those patents apply to product concepts such as 3DTV, with most of the rest related to a variety of topics including 3-D printing.

Sharp Electronics Corp. is the king of stereo 3-D intellectual property with at least 11 stereo 3-D patents granted since 1995. The company's patents have received a whopping 99 citations in other filings.

There's still time for the big players to catch up. One patent expert said patents only become really valuable when they apply to shipping products. Although Samsung and LG are experimenting with early 3DTV systems, most observers believe it could take three to five years or longer before the industry sets standards for 3DTVs geared for the mainstream.

"We haven't heard anyone talking about [3DTV patents] yet," said Joe Chernesky, president of IPotential (San Mateo, Calif.), a patent consulting and brokerage firm. "We typically see activity when there are products on the market that can be considered as infringing," he added.

Read the full article here.

Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on September 18, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.012 secs (new cache)