Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesTV Giants are Flatliners in Stereo 3-D Patents
By Philip Brooks
Rick Merritt writes in today's, September 18, 2008, EE Times:
The world's top television makers appear to hold no significant patents in stereoscopic 3-D despite the fact that some of the largest Hollywood studios want to drive the concept of 3DTV into the market. LG, Matsushita, Samsung, Sony and Toshiba currently have no significant patents on stereo 3-D, according to an initial patent search by EE Times.
Hollywood studios want to help set a standard for 3DTV so they can sell home versions of the increasing number of 3-D movies they are creating for the cinema. Some observers say stereo 3-D could be the next big thing in television beyond today's high definition flat panel systems. Others say the technology is far from ready for prime time.
Some 184 patents come up on a search of the U.S. patent office Web site for stereoscopic 3-D. About half those patents apply to product concepts such as 3DTV, with most of the rest related to a variety of topics including 3-D printing.
Sharp Electronics Corp. is the king of stereo 3-D intellectual property with at least 11 stereo 3-D patents granted since 1995. The company's patents have received a whopping 99 citations in other filings.
There's still time for the big players to catch up. One patent expert said patents only become really valuable when they apply to shipping products. Although Samsung and LG are experimenting with early 3DTV systems, most observers believe it could take three to five years or longer before the industry sets standards for 3DTVs geared for the mainstream.
"We haven't heard anyone talking about [3DTV patents] yet," said Joe Chernesky, president of IPotential (San Mateo, Calif.), a patent consulting and brokerage firm. "We typically see activity when there are products on the market that can be considered as infringing," he added.
Read the full article here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on September 18, 2008 (boomark / email).
Water Contamination
Industry giants to pay $500,000 settlement in environmental lawsuit.

Tech Giants Band Together to Buy and Sell Patents, But Not for Profit
The Morning After The Giants Won
FBI Unveils Attempted Blackmail Scheme Involving Giants Coach
IT players don't want patents []









