ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> IP Blawg

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: IP Blawg

Trademark Application Does Not Taste Quite Right

By Farella Braun + Martel LLP

ADVERTISEMENTS

As new products enter the marketplace, their developers are always on the lookout for ways to distinguish these products from existing or anticipated competing products. In the case of pharmaceuticals, one way to make a product stand out from the others in a highly competitive field is to give the product a unique, pleasant taste. To give the unique features of the product legal protection, can such a unique flavor be trademarked? According to a recent decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (?Board?) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the answer is ?no,? at least with respect to the flavor of a particular drug.

Organon makes a quick-dissolving antidepressant with an orange flavor, and it sought to register this flavor as a trademark for its product with the Trademark Office. The examiner denied the application on the grounds that the flavor was functional, and thus not entitled to registration under the Lanham Act, and that the flavor did not distinguish Organon?s antidepressant from other pharmaceutical products. Organon appealed to the Board, which, in a case of first impression, affirmed both of the examiner?s conclusions.

The Board began its analysis by recognizing that, under certain circumstances, scents, sounds and colors have been registered as trademarks. In that vein, the Board did not state that a flavor absolutely cannot constitute a registrable trademark. But in the case of Organon?s orange flavor for its antidepressant, the Board concluded that it was not entitled to registration for two reasons. First, the Board agreed with the examiner that the taste is functional. Specifically, the Board pointed to evidence showing that a pleasant flavor in a drug is effective in achieving increased patient compliance, which is an important functional component. Second, the Board held that consumers would not view the flavor of a pharmaceutical as a trademark, but rather an ?inherent feature of the product that would render it more appealing.? As an ?inherent feature? of the product, the flavor would not be entitled to trademark protection.

Organon may appeal to the Federal Circuit, so perhaps we have not heard the last of this. Should taste be entitled to a trademark? Under what circumstances? Let us know what you think.

Today's Blogger: Bob Sloss

Full post as published by IP Blawg on July 13, 2006 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0021 secs (from cache 10/31/26 11:42:49)