ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Seattle Trademark Lawyer

United States Olympic Committee Doesn't Sue "Olympic" Businesses Very Often

By Michael Atkins

ADVERTISEMENTS

Olympic%20logo.jpgA reporter recently asked me how often the United States Olympic Committee has sued the owner of an “Olympic”-named business in Washington. The answer? In the Western District of Washington, where I would expect such a suit to be brought: never. At least not since 1991, according to the federal courts’ U.S. Party/Case Index, which I checked out this afternoon.

Turns out as heavy-handed as the USOC seems to be lately in this state full of businesses named “Olympic” in honor of our Olympic Mountains, the USOC has taken a light touch when it comes to filing suit.

The same appears true around the country. Since 1991, it looks like the USOC has brought only 25 lawsuits identified by PACER as being “trademark” lawsuits, with only six suit against defendants with “Olympic” in their name. These include:

  • USOC v. Olympic Spa Covers Inc., No. 04-01096 (C.D. Calif);
  • USOC v. Olympic Carrier Corp., No. 02-00880 (N.D. Georgia);
  • USOC v. Olympic Protective Services, Inc., No. 01-01002 (N.D. Calif.);
  • USOC v. Bouzounis, d/b/a Olympic Incentive Ideas Inc., No. 91-00526 (S.D. Ohio);
  • USOC v. Olympic Diamond Corp., No. 91-00532 (E.D.N.Y); and
  • USOC v. Galaxy Cafe, d/b/a Olympic Cafe, No. 93-00288 (S.D. Georgia).

Of the six suits the USOC has brought, five were voluntarily dismissed after less than one year. None went to trial. Only one resulted in a judgment, and a consent judgment at that, with the owners of the Galaxy Cafe agreeing to pay the USOC $3,100 in attorney’s fees. The terms or amount of the USOC’s judgment in that case were not immediately available online.

I’m not a fan of the USOC. It has come across in Washington in recent months as a trademark bully. But this record shows the USOC either is all-bark and no-bite, or it is a lot more selective in the trade name cases it chooses to prosecute in court than it would first seem.

Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on January 29, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0157 secs (new cache)