Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Seattle Trademark LawyerUnited States Olympic Committee Doesn't Sue "Olympic" Businesses Very Often
By Michael Atkins
A reporter recently asked me how often the United States Olympic Committee has sued the owner of an “Olympic”-named business in Washington. The answer? In the Western District of Washington, where I would expect such a suit to be brought: never. At least not since 1991, according to the federal courts’ U.S. Party/Case Index, which I checked out this afternoon.
Turns out as heavy-handed as the USOC seems to be lately in this state full of businesses named “Olympic” in honor of our Olympic Mountains, the USOC has taken a light touch when it comes to filing suit.
The same appears true around the country. Since 1991, it looks like the USOC has brought only 25 lawsuits identified by PACER as being “trademark” lawsuits, with only six suit against defendants with “Olympic” in their name. These include:
- USOC v. Olympic Spa Covers Inc., No. 04-01096 (C.D. Calif);
- USOC v. Olympic Carrier Corp., No. 02-00880 (N.D. Georgia);
- USOC v. Olympic Protective Services, Inc., No. 01-01002 (N.D. Calif.);
- USOC v. Bouzounis, d/b/a Olympic Incentive Ideas Inc., No. 91-00526 (S.D. Ohio);
- USOC v. Olympic Diamond Corp., No. 91-00532 (E.D.N.Y); and
- USOC v. Galaxy Cafe, d/b/a Olympic Cafe, No. 93-00288 (S.D. Georgia).
Of the six suits the USOC has brought, five were voluntarily dismissed after less than one year. None went to trial. Only one resulted in a judgment, and a consent judgment at that, with the owners of the Galaxy Cafe agreeing to pay the USOC $3,100 in attorney’s fees. The terms or amount of the USOC’s judgment in that case were not immediately available online.
I’m not a fan of the USOC. It has come across in Washington in recent months as a trademark bully. But this record shows the USOC either is all-bark and no-bite, or it is a lot more selective in the trade name cases it chooses to prosecute in court than it would first seem.
Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on January 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Recall of TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count Sold in The United States and Puerto Rico
TYLENOL 8 Hour Caplets 50 Count One Lot Recalled in US and Puerto Rico
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
United Airlines Discriminates Against Blind Passengers
Cilantro
Recalled in 5 States
Lettuce
Recalled in 29 States due to Salmonella
Salmonella Outbreak
50 People Sick in Five States
Mars Petcare
Issues Recall of Special Kitty Gourmet in 15 States

Divided Tenth Rejects Suit to Treat Paralympians the Same as Olympians
Olympic name hotly protected Property of USOC
On the San Francisco Olympic Torch Relay
Zogby: 70% Believe IOC Was Wrong to Award Olympic Games to China








