ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer

When A Salary Is Not A Salary

By Bill Tucker

ADVERTISEMENTS

A federal judge recently ruled that managerial employees of supermarket chain Gristedes were not paid on a salary basis, which may open the door to a large verdict against the company. The lawsuit filed by managerial employees alleges that the company misclassified them as executive employees who are exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which requires among other factors that the employee be paid on a salary basis. Although Gristedes claimed that it paid the employees a weekly salary, it deducted pay from the workers' weekly paychecks for hours worked. Thus, the court ruled that the workers actually were paid on an hourly basis.

Federal overtime law requires an employer to pay workers one and one half times their normal rate of pay, or "time and a half", for time worked above forty hours in a work week unless the employer can prove the employee meets a specific exemption. Gristedes attempted to classify its managerial employees under the executive exemption, which typically applies to managers who are paid on a salary basis, supervise two or more employees, and have input in hiring, firing, and other decisions regarding employment status. With regard to the Gristedes employees, the court held that because the supermarket deducted pay from their paychecks for time not worked, the employees were not paid on a salary basis, and therefore the employer could not prove they met the requirements of the exemption.

Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Bill Tucker

Full post as published by Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer on September 10, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.014 secs (new cache)