Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Alabama Appellate Watch
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Alabama Appellate WatchPending Contempt Motions Make Custody Modifications Nonfinal
Judgments modifying child custody in two separate cases were not final where they did not dispose of pending motions to hold one parent in contempt. Appeals from the modification orders were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Butler v. Phillips, No. 2070488 (Ala. Civ. App. Aug. 29, 2008); Greenwood v. Greenwood, No. 2070452 (Ala. Civ. App. Aug. 29, 2008).
I - Butler
The parties in Butler exchanged a long volley of competing petitions to modify the child-custody and child-support provisions of their divorce judgment. On December 5, 2007, the trial court awarded custody of the parties’ children to the father, and ordered the mother to pay child support. The trial court denied the mother’s postjudgment motion to alter, amend or vacate this order, and the mother appealed.
The Court of Civil Appeals ruled that the December 5 order was not a final judgment. That order had not disposed of the mother’s earlier motion to hold the father in contempt for failing to pay child support. “[D]uring a postdivorce proceeding,” the Court of Civil Appeals explained,
[if] the trial court fails to rule on every pending contempt motion, its failure to do so . . . affect[s] the finality of the judgment . . . because, in such circumstances, the filing of each contempt motion does not initiate a separate and independent proceeding.
The trial court’s failure to dispose of the mother’s contempt motion thus rendered the December 5 modification order non-final. The Court of Civil Appeals accordingly dismissed the mother’s appeal.
II - Greenwood
Greenwood is almost identical. The custody-modification judgment appealed from in Greenwood left unresolved the father's motions for contempt --- though, here, the alleged contempt was for violating the divorce judgment's terms governing visitation. The Court of Civil Appeals found the modification order non-final, and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Full post as published by Alabama Appellate Watch on September 09, 2008 (boomark / email).
Child Support Orders
How to modify terms
Albertsons et al.
allegedly injected dye into farm raised salmon to make it appear more palatable.
Holiday Inn Express
Complimentary simplySmart™ "Remove" Make Up Remover Recalled
Family Law
involving divorce, child custody, spousal support, common law, adoption and same sex marriage.
Immigrant Sedation
US Government awards two detainees $55,000 settlement after drugging them while in custody.
Sheriff Interfered With Custody Battle
Greene County to pay $85,000 settlement in trespassing lawsuit.
Marriott
Hourly Wage Class Action Settlement Pending

Motion for Stay Pending Reexamination Granted with Modifications
Big changes to certificates of conferences
California Considers Revising Methodology Behind Custody Determinations









