ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Indiana Blogs -> Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Indiana

: Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer

Those red-light cameras going away?

ADVERTISEMENTS
The Indiana Lawyer reports they might be. From State puts brakes on red-light cameras:
"Green means go, red means stop. Motorists know that well, and in a 21st century society embracing technology on every front, it might not seem out of the ordinary to wonder if someone?s watching to make sure motorists are stopping when they should.

Not in Indiana, at least not at the moment.

The Indiana Attorney General?s Office has put the brakes on municipalities passing ordinances for the use of traffic light cameras in catching red-light runners. The state agency issued an official legal opinion Aug. 8, saying that any local ordinances or rules allowing the traffic control measures are illegal until state lawmakers first pass a statute allowing locals to move forward with those plans."

***

>Most recently, the attorney general?s opinion put the burden on legislators to decide how to proceed on red-light cameras. Sen. Earline Rogers, D-Gary, asked about the power of a municipality to implement those programs using stationary cameras to digitally photograph license plates of any vehicles entering an intersection on a red light. Hammond launched a pilot program in June for that, but at the time it was unclear whether state legislation was first needed before the ordinance could be adopted. Once the photos were taken, a private company operating the system would mail the tickets after a police review. Fines of $100 would be assessed and the tickets would be considered non-moving violations, similar to parking tickets.

Other communities including Gary, Hobart, Lafayette, and West Lafayette have expressed interest in the idea, which has grown more popular and controversial nationally. But the AG?s Office says no.

?A red-light camera ordinance would be an invalid attempt to locally regulate conduct that is already regulated by a state agency,? Attorney General Steve Carter wrote, noting that the General Assembly must first pass legislation. ?Unless expressly granted authority by statute, a local governmental entity?s passage of such an ordinance would be in contravention of the state?s home rule law at Indiana Code Section 36-1-3-8(a)(7).?

Full post as published by Indiana Civil & Business Lawyer on September 09, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.012 secs (new cache)