Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Cleveland Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Cleveland Personal Injury LawyerNew Proposal on Railroad Crossing Safety Will Do More Harm Than Good
By Halli Brownfield
The American Association for Justice (AAJ) reports that the Federal Highway Administration has proposed a policy that will require yield or stop signs at every railroad crossing in America. This policy may seem like a good public safety measure, but in reality it is anything but.
Studies show that the indiscriminate placement of stop signs at all rail road crossings would not enhance rail crossing safety. As the AAJ points out in its reponse and opposition to this policy submitted to the Federal Highway Administration, research has shown that collisions are more likely to occur at highway-rail grade crossings that have Stop signs than with any other form of warning. Stop signs should be used only after an engineering analysis has demonstrated that they are appropriate. The use of stop signs as a warning device at a particular railroad crossing may be inappropriate for many reasons. In the case of high speed rail crossings, a train may simply be traveling so fast that a motorist won't be able to see it approaching when it stops at the stop sign but cannot clear the crossing before the train arrives. In other situations, stop signs may be too far from the track for drivers to get a clear view of it. Currently, State and local highway agencies are vested with the discretion to decide whether to install Stop signs. This policy should not be changed.
As the AAJ points out, "the new requirement would afford immunity for those entities charged with monitoring such crossings where they clearly should not be entitled." In sum, not only would this policy do nothing to increase public safety, it would prevent individuals injured in rail crossing collisions where the use of a stop sign as the only form of a warning is negligent from holding anyone responsible for their negligence. Such a policy is contrary to the public interest.
For more information see:
http://www.atlanet.org/pressroom/PressReleases/2008/aug8.aspx
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Halli BrownfieldFull post as published by Cleveland Personal Injury Lawyer on September 05, 2008 (boomark / email).
Firestone Tire Problems Raise Questions of Safety
Are Your Car Tires Safe?
Railroad Workers
concerning the growing number of work-related injuries in the railroad industry.
Duragesic Pain Patch
alleging harm from defective pain patches.
Railroad Worker Leukemia
Union Pacific pays settlement to former manager exposed to carcinogenic chemicals.
Safety Violations
Murphy Oil USA Inc. to pay $179,100 settlement in occupational safety violations lawsuit.
FDA Issues Safety Warning About Valproic Acid and Divalproex Sodium
Valproic Acid and Divalproex Sodium FDA Issues Safety Warning About Risk for Birth Defects
FDA Issues Update on Safety Review Orlistat
Orlistat FDA Issues Update on Safety Review

Dangerous Railroad Crossing in Columbia Missouri Claims Two More Victims
Ft. Lauderdale Train Accident Leaves One Dead
Dangerous Rail Crossing to be Upgraded
Passing train hits Stanwood man
Rio Vista Teen Killed By Train








