ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Patent Law

: IPBiz

CAFC hears DBC, parallel case to Translogic on appointments issue

By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS
An "easy" way out to avoid the problem may be to rule that the time to challenge the administrative judges was at the time of the Board hearing, and not well after the Board hearing. The CAFC could simply say that it is "too late" to make this constitutional appeal for the first time with the CAFC. The issue was not properly preserved.

Separately, the government's case on the de facto officer doctrine looks weak. And, can the de facto officer doctrine be applied retroactively by statute?

How easily can the CAFC make this problem go away?

Full post as published by IPBiz on September 04, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.021 secs (new cache)