Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Michael Geist
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Michael Geist61 Reforms to C-61, Day 52: Education Internet Exception Is Harmful
By Michael Geist
Subsection (1) does not apply if the work or other subject-matter - or the Internet site where it is posted - is protected by a technological measure that restricts access to the work or other subject-matter or to the Internet site.
In other words, in return for the exception, CMEC and AUCC has effectively pushed the government to include a provision that encourages creators to use DRM or restrict access to their work. Many website owners who may be entirely comfortable with non-commercial or limited educational use of their materials, may object to a new law that grants the education community unfettered (and uncompensated) usage rights. Accordingly, many sites may opt out of the exception by making their work unavailable to everyone. This is obviously a lose-lose scenario that arises directly out of the exception.
Second, the implication of the exception is that using publicly-available Internet materials is not permitted unless one has prior authorization or qualifies for the exception. This suggests that millions of Canadians outside the education system who use Internet-based materials are somehow violating the law. This is simply wrong - an enormous amount of online content is intended for public use or qualifies as fair dealing - and to imply otherwise sends the wrong message. Indeed, many of the concerns expressed by the education community apply equally to other groups who do not qualify for the exception.
Third, the exception may violate international law. There are doubts that the provision complies with Canada’s existing obligations under the Berne Convention, the world's foremost international copyright treaty (ironic given that Bill C-61 is ostensibly about addressing international copyright issues). Given that the exception raises these real harms, it should scrapped by moving toward a flexible fair dealing provision.
Full post as published by Michael Geist on September 02, 2008 (boomark / email).
Gambling Governed by State Laws
State laws vary with respect to gambling
Internet/Technology
involving cyber law, consumer protection, internet crime, internet fraud, online gambling, e-commerce.
Mommy's Bliss
Nipple Cream Potentially Harmful
Department of Education Fraud
$4.25 million settlement to be paid in whistleblower lawsuit.
Racist Voicemail
Stamford Board of Education pays student $37,500 settlement after failing to protect her from racial discrimination.
Wrong Bus
Greenbrier County Board of Education agrees to $15,000 negligence settlement after dropping a 5-year-old off at the wrong spot.
Bell Canada
allegedly throttling internet speeds

Single-Sex Education Stereotypes Boys
Sweeping Quebec education reforms leaving curious teens without sex ed
Is Financial Education a Good Idea and Whose Idea Is It Anyway
Campaign Unmasks Comprehensive Sex Education
Blawg of the Day -- Best Practices for Legal Education








