Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Constitutional Law Blogs -> Of Arms and the Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Constitutional Law
: Of Arms and the LawKY Supremes to consider retroactivity of "no retreat"
Story here.
Had the same issue here in AZ. It'd help if drafters of legislation remembered always to include a saving clause. I.e., this legislation applies to events occuring after the effective date, or prosecutions filed after its date, or cases pending on its date, or cases or appeals pending on its date. Just say what it is, and that's it. Leave it open, and anything can happen (most likely the courts find it only applies to events occurring after its date). I did some research a ways back, and found some cases indicating that a loosening of a criminal statute is given broad effect, while a tightening, under the double jeopardy clause, can't be given.
Full post as published by Of Arms and the Law on August 31, 2008 (boomark / email).

Interesting crack retroactivity letters sent around to judges
"Waiver and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel--when to Raise it."
Gitmo detainees have a right to be heard in federal court, Supremes say
NY Times and NAACP speak out against the AG on crack retroactivity







