ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Federal Judiciary

: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice

Claims construction not changed in subsequent case

By Michael Smith

ADVERTISEMENTS

LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Asus Computer Intern., 2008 WL 3914095(E.D.Tex. Aug 18, 2008)
Judge: Chad Everingham
Holding: Motion to Modify Claim Construction ruling  DENIED pretty much.
The parties in this case asked Judge Everingham to modify certain of the claim construction rulings regarding this patent contained in a prior Markman ruling by Judge Ward in a prior case.  Judge Everingham did not change any of Judge Ward's constructions, but did address some issues not contained in the prior construction.

Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on August 28, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0209 secs (new cache)