ADVERTISEMENT



Google       
Call (866) 635-2689 for a free Personal Injury evaluation by attorney in your area.

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Traumatic Brain Injury Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Personal Injury Law

: Traumatic Brain Injury Law Blog

Six Myths Regularly Encountered in Forensic Practices

By Bruce Stern

ADVERTISEMENTS

The June issue of Clinical Neuropsychologist contains an article by Manfred F. Greiffenstein, a psychologist from Royal Oak, Michigan. 
 
In his article, Dr. Greiffenstein comments on six myths that he regularly encounters in his defense  forensic practice.  I earlier discussed my agreement with him where he attacks the idea that only the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery is legally admissible under Daubert.
 
However, I take exception with him when he implies that there is no permanency resulting from mild traumatic brain injury.
 
In this section of his paper, Dr. Greiffenstein quotes from Dr. Iverson’s 2005 paper stating that the commonly accepted figure for permanent disability following mild TBI is 15% is incorrect. 
 
While Dr. Greiffenstein accurately quotes from Dr. Iverson’s paper, he fails to acknowledge that even Iverson accepts that there is a percentage of mild TBI patients who do not go on to a full and uneventful recovery but rather, develop  long-term chronic and permanent residuals from mild TBI.
 
Dr. Greiffenstein is a co-author with Dr. Paul Lees-Haley of a study dealing with the neuropsychological effects following exposure to manganese.  You will recall that the Center for Public Integrity and Mother Jones recently published an expose with regard to the amount of money paid by the welding industry to Paul Lees-Haley.  Dr. Greiffenstein also acknowledges that his practice includes “defense selected evaluations in personal injury matters.”  He also thanks Drs. Larrabee and Binder for their preliminary reviews and helpful criticisms.  A review of deposition testimony given by Larrabee and Binder reflect that they, like Dr. Greiffenstein, primarily performed defense forensic evaluations.
 
Those who represent people who have sustained traumatic brain injury need to investigate the biases of the authors and journals and editors of journals before being so quickly to accept the authenticity of any cited literature.

Full post as published by Traumatic Brain Injury Law Blog on August 27, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.013 secs (new cache)