Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Landlord-Tenant Attorney
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: Seattle Landlord-Tenant AttorneyThe Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Property Managers
By Scott Eller, Esq.
The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) applies to any person who regularly collects or attempts to collect debts for another. This includes property management firms, but does not include landlords acting pro se.
The FDCPA exempts attempts to collect debts that were not in default when obtained. This exemption would apply as long as the tenant was not in default when the property management firm was retained.
Conversely, if a property manager accepts an assignment of a debt after it becomes due and is in default the exemption does not apply.
The FDCPA requires in the initial communication, whether written or oral, a disclosure that the communication is an attempt to collect a debt and that any information will be used for that purpose.
This disclosure must also be made in any subsequent communication, except formal legal pleadings.
In addition, within five days of the initial communication the debt collector must also give notice of the certain rights, namely:
- the right to dispute the debt within 30 days
- the debt amount
- the name of the creditor
- that the creditor will assume the debt is valid unless the consumer disputes its validity within 30 days after receiving the notice
- that if the consumer notifies the collector in writing within 30 days that the debt is disputed the collector will mail the consumer verification of the debt or a copy of the judgment against the consumer and
- that the collector will provide the consumer with the name and address of the original creditor (if different from the current creditor).
Any debt collector who violates the FDCPA may be liable for actual damages and humiliation, embarrassment and mental anguish/emotional distress, statutory damages of $1,000 at the discretion of the court, plus court costs and attorney?s fees.
Full post as published by Seattle Landlord-Tenant Attorney on August 24, 2008 (boomark / email).
Collection Agencies and Creditors
How to deal and stop the harassment
Bankruptcy Law
A complete prime (pre-2005)
Nanotechnology Law
Intellectual property laws
Fair Housing Act
Prevent discrimination by landlords
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act
Phantom Income Relief on Debt Cancellation
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Mel Harris and Associates Debt Collection
Face Class Action for Alleged "Sewer Service" Practices
UAB Health System and Franklin Collection Service
allegedly violated the RICO Act in collection practices on delinquent patient accounts.
Creditor Debt
Trophy Resources agrees to $600,000 debt settlement.
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
UPS Faces Fair Labor Wages Class Action
Northwestern Mutual
Faces $200 Million Fair Labor Class Action
Correctional Managers
Jury orders Marion County to pay $1 million racial discrimination settlement to two former employees.

Podcast - Elements Necessary For Fair Debt Collection Practices Act To Apply
When Can An Alabama Consumer Sue A Debt Collector - Part One
FTC's 2008 Report on Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FTC Issues 2008 Fair Debt Collection Practices Report to Congress
Interesting Post About Abusive Debt Collectors -- Written By A Collection Attorney
Collection Letters Often Are Illegal In Alabama








