Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> The Real Cost of Prisons Weblog

Criminal Law

: The Real Cost of Prisons Weblog

Judges Vetted by White House More Likely to Reject Asylum Bids

By Real Cost of Prisons Project (The Sentencing Project)

August 24, 2008 Vetted Judges More Likely to Reject Asylum Bids By CHARLIE SAVAGE NY Times WASHINGTON ? Immigrants seeking asylum in the United States have been disproportionately rejected by judges whom the Bush administration chose using a conservative political litmus test, according to an analysis of Justice Department data. The analysis suggests that the effects of a patronage-style selection process for immigration judges ? used for three years before it was abandoned as illegal ? are still being felt by scores of immigrants whose fates are determined by the judges installed in that period. The data focuses on 16 judges who were vetted for political affiliation before being hired and have since ruled on at least 100 cases each. Comparison of their records to others in the same cities shows that as a group they ruled against asylum-seekers significantly more often than colleagues who were appointed, as the law requires, under politically neutral rules...continue to full post

Full post as published by The Real Cost of Prisons Weblog on August 24, 2008 (boomark / email).