Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectJudicial Decision Making Does Not Require Judicial Activism: A Response to Prof. Althouse
By Alliance Defense Fund
ADVERTISEMENTS
Ann Althouse, a law professor at the University of Wisconsin, has written an interesting (but flawed) piece arguing that "judicial activism" on abortion will not disappear if the Supreme Court reverses Roe v. Wade, because courts will still have to address cases involving abortion. Also, she argues that passage of state constituitonal amendments defining marriage as one man and one woman will not eliminate "judicial activism" in the area of marriage, ...(read more)Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on October 23, 2006 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Lawsuits and Settlements
Darvon
Other Propoxyphene-Containing Meds to Require Stronger Warnings
False Claims
Attorney Robert Arledge ordered to pay $5.8 million after making false Fen Phen settlement claims.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Judicial procedural appellate activism
The Judicial Activism of the Roberts Court
What Is Judicial Activism More Importantly: How Do You Prove It
Mark Tushnet on "Judicial Activism":









