ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectKevin Kelly: "Gonzales v. Carhart: Summary and Implications"
By Alliance Defense Fund
ADVERTISEMENTS
Overall, the Court?s decision is a significant victory for the pro-life movement. Although the Court did not explicitly overturn the Stenberg decision, it effectively did so in many ways. And by structuring the Gonzales v. Carhart decision in such a way that the Roe and Casey frameworks were assumed and not reaffirmed as law, the Court has prepared the away for future challenges to the basic premises of abortion jurisprudence.
...(read more)Full post as published by Constitutionally Correct on April 19, 2007 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Oscar Winner Sues Production Company
Ascendant pays Kevin Costner undisclosed amount in settlement.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Ronald Turner the "Women's Regret" Rationale in Gonzales v. Carhart
Steven Calabresi on Substantive Due Process After Gonzales v. Carhart
Department of Justice Report Will Not Suggest Charges Against former AG Gonzalez
Joshua E. Perry on the Biopolitics of Gonzales v. Carhart
New York City Police Order Refresher Training After Taser Death
"Significant risks: Gonzales v Carhart and the future of abortion law."







