ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate & Securities Law Blogs -> The Wired GC

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate & Securities Law

: The Wired GC

Hating the Rating

By John Wallbillich

ADVERTISEMENTS

A recent dust-up involving anonymous online feedback may give some insight into future ratings for lawyers.

The website involved, TheFunded, purports to offer information on VC firms and deal terms from anonymous entrepreneurs, allegedly with experience. One recent feedback posting involved EDF Ventures. Rather than repeating it, there’s more on it here.

EDF didn’t like the posting and somehow thought it was advisable to subpoena TheFunded to discover the identity of the poster. One of EDF’s founders was quoted in this week’s Crain’s Detroit Business (scroll down) as saying:

With anonymous postings, you can either let something patently untrue just sit there, or you can try to find out who it is. We want to talk to them and set the record straight.

You can probably guess how this turned out. EDF has succeeded in one sense: putting a rather large exclamation point on the matter.

When we move from the VC shpere to the legal space, the case of TheFunded shows that online ratings and feedback have pitfalls for the raters and the rated.

The problem isn’t just that the feedback’s anonymous–that’s actually a cornerstone of most client surveys. It can be honest and constructive or vindictive and brutal.

Any feedback about lawyers that’s not anonymous will almost always be favorable, when you think about it. The queue to give a signed low public rating to a bellicose litigator will likely be a short one.

Lawyer rating site Avvo drew some fire when it started out; it has now emerged from beta and is scaling well, targeted more at consumers than the corporate counsel crowd. That latter market will do what it’s always done: rely on personal referrals when possible. Increasingly, however, the search may start by looking at a rating in a gated legal community or a recommendation in a lawyer-only network.

The other lesson: if you have the urge to “go after” something published online about your company, consult two lawyers: (a) one about how to do it, and (b) another about whether you should. And first make it clear to lawyer (b) that she won’t handle the matter.

Seems like overkill; probably cheap in the long run.

up or down?

Full post as published by The Wired GC on August 20, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0137 secs (new cache)