ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Seattle Trademark Lawyer

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Intellectual Property Law

: Seattle Trademark Lawyer

Trafficking in Counterfeit Labels Renders Alien Inadmissible to Stay in United States

By Michael Atkins

ADVERTISEMENTS

On Aug. 6, the Ninth Circuit concluded that willingly trafficking in counterfeit goods constitutes “inherently fraudulent” conduct that renders an alien ineligible for a visa to remain in the United States.

Mr. Hung Lin Wu, a 45-year-old permanent resident of the United States and citizen of Taiwan, pleaded guilty to trafficking in counterfeit labels. The U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals found this was a crime involving moral turpitude and, therefore, that Mr. Wu was ineligible to remain here.

Mr .Wu appealed.

The Ninth Circuit denied his petition.

In particular, the Ninth Circuit found that pleading guilty to “knowingly [trafficking] in a counterfeit label affixed or designed to be affixed to” a specified set of materials is “categorically a plea to an inherently fraudulent crime because the statute of conviction’s elements fit within the definition of inherently fraudulent conduct, which is knowingly making false representations in order to gain something of value.”

“First, counterfeit labels are by definition false representations because they ‘appear[] to be genuine, but [are] not.’ Persons who traffic in such materials knowing them to be counterfeit perpetuate the false representation, as they are knowingly passing off counterfeit material as real. Second, according to [18 U.S.C.] § 2318, the term ‘traffic’ means ‘to transport … as consideration for anything of value.’ Therefore, the act of trafficking is done necessarily ‘to gain something of value.’”

By this reasoning, and under the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Tall v. Mukasey (STL post here), the court found that Mr. Wu had committed a crime of moral turpitude, rendering him inadmissible to live here.

The case cite Wu v. Mukasey, 2008 WL 3166511 (9th Cir. Aug. 8, 2008).

Full post as published by Seattle Trademark Lawyer on August 18, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0141 secs (new cache)